The Performance of Field School Instructors in Enhancing Farmers’ Capacities (A Qualitative Study of Field Schools in Klaten Regency)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v4i9.91Keywords:
Performance of Field School Facilitators, Field Schools, Farmer Capacity, Participatory ExtensionAbstract
This study aims to describe the role of Field School Facilitators (PSL), identify factors influencing their performance, and analyze strategies to increase farmer participation and understanding in Klaten Regency. The study employed a qualitative approach using a case study design. Data were collected through interviews, participatory observation, and documentation, and were then analyzed thematically based on Braun and Clarke’s framework. The results indicate that FSLs perform their role as facilitators quite well through their mastery of subject matter, effective communication, and participatory methods. FSL performance is influenced by limited resources, heavy workloads, the size of the area under their supervision, differences in participants’ understanding, and farmer attendance. Support in the form of training, mentoring, evaluation, facilities, and incentives is needed to enhance FSL professionalism and the effectiveness of the Field Schools.
References
Agriculture Organization (Ed.). (2017). The state of food and agriculture 2016: Climate change, agriculture and food security. Food & Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO).
Angrosino, M. V. (2007). Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research. Sage Publications.
Badan Pusat Statistik Jakarta Pusat , 2024. Produk Domestik Bruto Indonesia Triwulanan 2020–2024, Volume 7. Jakarta Pusat : Badan Pusat Statistik
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (24 September 2024). Luas Panen, Produksi, dan Produktivitas Padi Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Diakses pada 7 Februari 2025, dari https://jateng.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NDYzIzI=/luas-panen-produksi-dan-produktivitas-padi-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-jawa-tengah.html
Bartlett, Andrew. (2005). Farmer Field Schools to promote Integrated Pest Management in Asia: the FAO Experience.
Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2020). "The Role of Farmer Field Schools in Transforming Agriculture." Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12, 45-65.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). "Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method." Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). "Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology." Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, A., & Duveskog, D. (2011). The Farmer Field School approach–History, global assessment and success stories. Background paper for the IFAD Rural poverty report.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th Edition. Sage Publications.
Direktorat Jenderal Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan SDM Pertanian (2021). Laporan Tahunan. Kementerian Pertanian RI.
FAO. 2021. Evaluation of FAO’s contributions to Sustainable Development Goal 2- Farmer field schools and their derivatives. Rome.
Kementerian Pertanian, 2014. Membangun Ketahanan Pangan Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Petani: Kinerja Pembangunan Pertanian 2010-2014: Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd Edition. Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Pontius, J., Dilts, R., & Bartlett, A. (2002). From Farmer Field School to Community IPM: Ten Years of IPM Training in Asia. FAO.
Prasetyo, D., Wardani, R., & Hidayat, T. (2022). "Adaptasi Petani terhadap Perubahan Iklim melalui Sekolah Lapang Iklim di Subang." Agriklimatologi Indonesia, 20(1), 55-68.
Pretty, J. (1995). Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Self-Reliance. Earthscan, London.
Pretty, J., Guijt, I., Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (2001). Participatory Learning and Action: A Trainer's Guide. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
Rice yields, 2022 (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/rice-yields)
Röling, N., & Van de Fliert, E. (1994). "Transforming extension for sustainable agriculture: The case of Integrated Pest Management in rice in Indonesia." Agriculture and Human Values, 11(2-3), 96-108.
Sartas, M., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., & Campbell, M. (2018). "Digital Solutions for Farmer Training: Lessons from Farmer Field Schools." Agricultural Systems, 165, 170-181.
Simatupang, T., Pasaribu, H. S., & Wibowo, T. (2015). "The Impact of Farmer Field School on Rice Production in North Sumatera." Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 7(2), 89-102.
Slamet, R. M., Asngari, P. S., & Tjitropranoto, P. (2002). Efektivitas sekolah lapangan pengendalian hama terpadu dalam penyulihan pertanian: kasus: Propinsi Sumatera Barat (Doctoral dissertation, IPB University).
Suharto, W., Setiawan, B., & Nugroho, K. (2017). "Efektivitas Sekolah Lapang PHT di Yogyakarta." Jurnal Pertanian Berkelanjutan, 15(2), 101-115.
Tripp, R., Wijeratne, M., & Piyadasa, V. H. (2005). "What should we expect from Farmer Field Schools? A Sri Lanka case study." World Development, 33(10), 1705-1720.
Tim Pusat Kajian Anggaran-Badan Keahlian SET-JEN DPR RI, 2021. Tinjauan Kritis Produksi Padi Nasional, Pusat Kajian Anggaran-Badan Keahlian SET-JEN DPR RI.
Van den Berg, H., & Jiggins, J. (2007). "The impact of Farmer Field Schools in relation to Integrated Pest Management." World Development, 35(4), 663-686.
Wardani, R., Suherman, T., & Kartika, S. (2020). "Kinerja Pemandu Sekolah Lapang di Kabupaten Subang: Analisis Kompetensi dan Motivasi." Jurnal Penyuluhan Pertanian, 16(2), 80-94.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th Edition. Sage Publications.
