Implementation of Article 9c of Law Number 22 of 2022 Concerning Correctional Facilities in Class Iia Labuhan Ruku Prison

Authors

  • Nuzulul Ardhie Wibowo Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Nursariani Simatupang Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v4i9.85

Keywords:

Prisoners' Rights, Education, Potential Development, Corrections, Labuhan Ruku Prison, Social Reintegration.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the fulfillment of prisoners' rights in obtaining education and developing their potential based on Article 9 letter c of Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections in Class IIA Labuhan Ruku Prison and identify factors that hinder its implementation. This study uses an empirical legal research method with a juridical-sociological approach. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation studies, then analyzed qualitatively using legal protection theory and legal effectiveness theory. The results of the study show that the fulfillment of prisoners' rights has been pursued through educational activities, teaching, personality and independence development, recreational activities, and various skills and potential development programs. The implementation shows that there are efforts by the prison in translating the normative guarantees of Article 9 letter c into a coaching program that supports rehabilitation and social reintegration. However, the implementation is not fully optimal because it is influenced by limited facilities and infrastructure, human resources, budget, number of inmates, diversity of characteristics and motivations of participants, security considerations, and limited cooperation with external parties. Optimizing the fulfillment of these rights requires strengthening institutional capacity, facilities, human resources, and sustainable development programs.

References

Asmawati, H. (2022). Analisis Penguatan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Melalui Konsep Reintegrasi Sosial. Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v1i2.209

Easton, S. (2022). Not just another brick in the wall? Protecting prisoners’ right to education. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100530

Erwin Asmadi, Padian Adi Selamat, Benito Asdhie Kodyat, I. K. (2021). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana Selama Pandemi Covid-19. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v6i2.9431

Georgios Chloupis, D. K. (2025). Examining the relation between education, recidivism & crime prevention. Discov Glob Soc, 3(18). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00153-0

Gina Gaharuli, G. A. A. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI UU PEMASYARAKATAN TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN TERHADAP HAK NARAPIDANA DALAM MENDAPATKAN PENDIDIKAN DI LAPAS KELAS I MADIUN. Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Law, 1(1).

Glory Sumiaty Nainggolan, Berlian Simarmata, B. S. S. (2024). Proses Pemberian Remisi Kepada Narapidana Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang yang bersumber dari Korupsi di lembaga pemasyarakatan Kelas 1 Tanjung Gusta Medan. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i02.534

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. PT Bina Ilmu.

Higgins, L. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Rehabilitation in the Prison Context. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25771/mcrw-yw06

Jr, R. D. L. (1996). Prisoners’ rights to recreation: Quantity, quality, and other aspects. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(95)00063-1

Muhammad Anis, Marzuki, N. (2025). mplimentasi Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan Dalam Upaya Pemberdayaan Narapidana Sebagai Bentuk Persiapan Kerja Pasca Pembinaan di Lapas Perempuan Kelas IIB Sigli. MEUSAPAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47647/meusapat.v4i1.3098

Mulyadi. (2024). The Relationship between Legal Effectiveness Theory and Coaching Effectiveness Prisoners in Correctional Institutions. Focus Journal Law Review, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62795/fjl.v4i1.256

Nainggolan, I. (2019). Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Menjalankan Rehabilitasi Terhadap Narapidana Narkotika. EduTech (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial), 5(2).

Papy Michael Napu, Rudepel Petrus Leo, H. A. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI HAK-HAK NARAPIDANA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2022 SERTA HAMBATAN-HAMBATANNYA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS IIA KUPANG. Petitum Law Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35508/pelana.v1i1.13349

Soekanto, S. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Tisa Windayani. (2026). ANALISIS REINTEGRASI SOSIAL DALAM UU PEMASYARAKATAN BERDASARKAN UNODC SOCIAL REINTEGRATION TOOLKIT. JURNAL GLORIA JUSTITIA, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25170/gloriajustitia.

Widya Oktavia, B. S. (2026). Implementation of Rehabilitation of Narcotics Users as Detention According to Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009: A Case Study of BNNP Central Java. Law Research Review Quarterly, 12(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/llrq.v12i1.41054

Yustiana, Muhammad Yunus, S. S. (2023). Implikasi Hukum Atas Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Warga Binaan Khususnya Pembinaan dan Asimilasi Pada Narapidana Dengan Kasus Narkotika dan Over Capacity di Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas II b Sen. Legal Journal of Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01