The Effectiveness of Investigator Discretion in the Application of Restorative Justice to Criminal Cases at the People's Island Police Reviewed from Legal Certainty and Substantive Justice dan Keadilan Substantif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v4i9.69Keywords:
Investigator Discretion, Restorative Justice, Legal Certainty, substantive justice, Criminal Case SettlementAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of investigators' discretion in the application of restorative justice in the settlement of criminal cases at the People's Island Police from the perspective of legal certainty and substantive justice. The research uses normative legal methods with a legislative approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Legal materials are obtained through literature studies that include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, then analyzed qualitatively by prescriptive analysis methods. The results of the study show that the discretion of investigators is a legitimate authority based on Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia and the Regulation of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Crimes Based on Restorative Justice. The effectiveness of the exercise of discretion is influenced by the clarity of the legal arrangements, the professionalism of investigators, compliance with procedures, monitoring mechanisms, and the participation of the parties in the peace process. This study also found that legal certainty and substantive justice are two principles that complement each other in the implementation of restorative justice. Legal certainty provides normative limits on the use of discretion, while substantive justice ensures that case resolution is able to restore victims' rights, foster perpetrators' responsibility, and create social harmony. Therefore, the use of investigator discretion must be carried out professionally, proportionately, transparently, and accountably so that the goal of fair law enforcement can be realized.
References
Alfano Ramadhan. (2021). Diskresi Penyidik Polri Sebagai Alternatif Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Lex Renaissan, 6(1).
Anthony Bottoms, J. T. (2012). Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 119. https://doi.org/https://scholarlycommons.law.
Daly, K. (2016). What is Restorative Justice? Fresh Answers to a Vexed Question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.
Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Louisiana State University Press.
Elizabeth Ruth Turner, M. R. (2024). Beyond ‘police discretion’: The need for a new conceptual vocabulary. Sage Journals, 30(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806241297311
Fadilah Agustin, A. V. (2026). The Application Of Restorative Justice As A New Paradigm Of Punishment In The New Criminal Code (Law No. 1 Of 2023) In Misdemeanor Crimes. HUKUM RESPONSIF, 17(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v17i2.12255
Gana Yudha Pratama, A. W. L. (2024). Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Implementation on Embezzlement Cases in Progressive Law Perspective (Case Study: Polda Metro Jaya). Ratio Legis Journal, 3(4). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.1181-1190
Hendry Noya, Fendi M.P. Hutahaean, S. S. U. S. U. (2025). The Development of Restorative Justice in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. International Journal of New Approaches to Law and Rationality in Nationhood, Governance, and Rights Advocacy, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56861/.v1i1.167
Johan Rofi, Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan, L. M. (2025). Integration of Legal Certainty and Restorative Justice in the Phases of General Criminal Investigation : An Examination of Law Enforcement by the Indonesian National Police. International Journal of Law and Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i2.346
Moh. Riziq, A. (2025). A Critical Analysis of Restorative Justice in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System: from Punishment to Restoration. International Journal of Law Dynamics Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62039/ijldr.v3i1.82
Muh Hajoran Pulungan, M. S. (2026). Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Procedure Code: Between Legal Certainty and Law Enforcement Officer Discretion. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 26(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.045-060
Sukardi, H. R. P. (2022). Restorative Justice Principles in Law Enforcement and Democracy in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.53057
Terry Hutchinson, N. D. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21153/
Thomas Procter-Legg, Jonathan Hobson, E. Q. (2024). Restorative justice and social justice: an international perspective Listen Research Articles Restorative justice and social justice: an international perspective. Contemporary Justice Review, 2(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.
